🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager could survive losing against lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Conflict Over System and Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.